|
Post by Julius CMXCIX on Nov 9, 2008 18:31:04 GMT
Hope I didn't forget any, but I'm sure I did.
|
|
|
Post by Morgoth on Nov 9, 2008 19:23:42 GMT
I'll need to think about it. I am currently leaning towards El Cid, because it had some scenarios that actually felt good, but...
No, I'll go for Saladin, only because how much replay value the last two scenarios had for me.
|
|
|
Post by Julius CMXCIX on Nov 9, 2008 20:04:48 GMT
I liked the first scenario of the Attila campaign, which I see I spelt wrong in the polling options. Oh well.
It had all those options at the start. I like the freedom to choose. That said, the rest of the campaign was pretty mediocre. The best all round was probably El Cid, for me.
Feel free to mention which your thought was the worst too. It doesn't really justify another poll all to itself.
|
|
|
Post by jon. on Nov 9, 2008 20:46:26 GMT
I personally liked the Joan of Arc campaign, just for nostalgia's sake.
Montezuma was probably the worst, with nothing special about it.
|
|
|
Post by Morgoth on Nov 9, 2008 21:37:04 GMT
Yeah, Montezuma wasn't good. Neither was William Wallace.
|
|
Jatayu
Stormwind Member
Jatayu
Posts: 1,064
|
Post by Jatayu on Nov 10, 2008 4:38:48 GMT
Well the only two I played fully were Barbarossa and Saladin, and I didn't like either very much really. I liked many scenarios in 'Conquerors' campaigns mainly because there were different civs in each.
|
|
Andan
Stormwind Member
Andan
Attempting to design a scenario
Posts: 756
|
Post by Andan on Nov 16, 2008 21:32:34 GMT
In AoK:TC, Attila. Though the fun factor keeps declining towards the end of the campaign, it's still the best in my opinion.
In AoK, Genghis Khan. I've always liked that historical figure, and the campaign itself was entertaining enough to keep me from pushing the quit button.
|
|
|
Post by Basse on Nov 17, 2008 8:37:22 GMT
I'm torn between El Cid, Genghis Khan and Joan of Arc. In the end, I went for El Cid. I liked all the campaigns, even though they all had some problems, some more than others. For example; Montezuma: too little variation, no heroes at all in the entire campaign. A Cortéz, Montezuma or Chuatemoch hero would've been awesome, and great to use for designing later on. Atilla: great starting scenarios, great with the sea walls, planted plenty of mystique to the editor as I played this first when I was quite little . But the entertainment-value decreases quickly unfortunately, even though the storytelling between scenarios is still probably the greates of all campaigns.
|
|